Wednesday, October 31, 2018

Souls Abroad Tonight

Photo by Linda Xu on Unsplash
There was the Celtic feast of Samhain on October 31st. Then it was superceded by the Christian celebration of  'All Saints Day' on November 1st  and 'All Souls Day' on November 2nd. Now we have the secular festivities of Halloween, taken from Ireland to the United States and now back here, again on October 31st. Each of these have been in celebration of the dead, as they have been honoured in various ways for centuries; millenia even.

I have death and burial dates for many of my and my siblings' ancestors. When you have visitors round 'trick-or-treating', or even when you go out 'trick-or-treating' yourself, you may like to think of all these ancestors of yours. You will carry their DNA as well as the DNA of all those other ancestors whose dates, and even names, we do not know.

Reinhold Yarker de Laybourne, dd 1490
Anna (--?--), bd 14 Apr 1541
Thomas Yarker, bd 28 Apr 1549
Margaret (--?--), bd 6 Aug 1551
William Yarker de Laybourne, bd 5 Feb 1577
Michael Yarker, bd 14 May 1654
Jane Gregory (--?--), bd 28 Jan 1680
Agnes Nicolson, bd 29 Jan 1712
Stephen Osmond, dd 7 Jul 1713, bd 10 Oct 1713
Elizabeth Geater, dd 22 Sep 1717, bd 25 Sep 1717
Janet Wharton, bd 27 Dec 1727
George Richardson, dd 1732
John Eastland, dd 1733
Robert Fallowfield, dd 2 Feb 1750
William Piercy, bd  27 Mar 1750
John Yarker, bd 8 Oct 1753
Thomas Bishopp, dd 1754
Isabella (--?--), bd 27 Jan 1775
Matthew Wingrave, dd 16 Feb 1775
Elizabeth Rawlins, bd 2 Dec 1776
John Osmond, bd 13 Oct 1778
Mary (--?--), bd 16 Sep 1780
Edward Richardson, dd 3 Feb 1781
Susanna Crow, dd 6 Apr 1798, bd 14 Apr 1798
Robert Yarker, dd 1 Mar 1799, bd 4 Mar 1799
William Piercy, dd 4 Aug 1799, bd 7 Aug 1799
Thomas Cole, bd 15 Mar 1800
Ann Cripps, dd 2 Jan 1801
Sarah Harris, dd 3 Mar 1801, bd 6 Mar 1801
Sarah Brett, dd 30 Sep 1801, bd 2 Oct 1801
Edward Eastland, dd 2 Oct 1802
George Ellidge, bd 1806
John Osmond, bd 15 Apr 1808
Elizabeth Green, dd 17 Sep 1808
John Richardson, dd 2 Jul 1809, bd 5 Jul 1809
Stephen Bishopp, dd 23 Jan 1814, bd 31 Jan 1814
John Osmond, dd 1820
Sarah Jackson, bd 28 Apr 1825
Henry Yarker, dd 3 Mar 1826
Rev Richard Ellidge, dd 26 Oct 1832
Susannah Hill, dd 11 Feb 1833, bd 17 Feb 1833
Ann (--?--), bd 19 May 1833
John Bishopp, dd 24 Aug 1835, bd 29 Aug 1835
Sarah Kennett, bd 6 Feb 1837
Henry Hooper, bd 23 May 1839
Elizabeth Rawlings, dd 22 Nov 1841, bd 27 Nov 1841
Blythe Anthony, dd 1842
John Ware, dd 27 Sep 1845
Mary Goddard, dd 1849
Richard Piercy, bd 31 Aug 1851
Francis Dalton, dd 25 Dec 1853, bd 28 Dec 1853
Thomas Wingrave, dd c 1857
Edward Richardson, dd 2 Dec 1857
Benjamin Cole, dd 1860
Susanna(h) Plumtree, dd 1863
Margaret Mills, dd 26 May 1864, bd 26 Jun 1864
Ann (--?--), dd 1868
Sarah Yarker, dd 14 Jun 1868
Ann Pullin, dd 16 Jan 1869
Henry Yarker Richardson, dd 6 Dec 1870, bd 31 Dec 1870
Elizabeth Clements, dd 1871
Emma Oakes Ellidge, dd Jan 1871
Mary Poore, dd 1876
Richard Osmond, dd 22 Mar 1878  
Blyth(e) Cole, dd  4 Feb 1883
John Richard Bishopp, dd 16 Jan 1888
Edmund Osmond, dd 8 May 1889
Elizabeth Sarah Anne Ware, dd 6 Jul 1893
Sarah Hooper, dd 23 Mar 1896
Jeremiah Piercy, dd 14 Aug 1896
George Bishopp, dd 26 May 1903
Harriet Wingrave, dd 1904
Henry Ellidge Richardson, dd 20 Nov 1918, bd 27 Nov 1918
William Piercy, dd 30 Aug 1920
Matilda Jane Dalton, dd 13 Sep 1926
Thomas Hooper Osmond, dd 22 Mar 1929
Alice Maude Hunt, dd b 9 Jan 1935, bd  9 Jan 1935
Frank Piercy, dd 23 Apr 1952
Jessie Marian Bishopp, dd 20 Mar 1954
Alice Wingrave Richardson, dd 11 Jun 1966
Olive Elizabeth Osmond, dd 6 Mar 1974, bd 12 Mar 1974
Henry Graham Piercy, dd 11 Jun 1996


The life of the dead is placed in the memory of the living. 
Marcus Tullius Cicero

Sunday, February 19, 2017

The Ten-Year Wait: Filling the Census Gap

National Registration Identity Card
Scanned by J.P. Brettle
Document in personal collection of
 J.P. Brettle
[Public domain],
via Wikimedia Commons
Every ten years genealogists and family historians get their biggest and best birthday present. 

Ten years is the twinkling of an eye in genealogical time. Ten years is a lifetime while waiting for genealogical data to become available. Ten years is the period between each UK census.

For the genealogist and family historian a census can be a treasure trove of information. Well, a treasure trove when we can find our ancestors in it and a source of much frustration when we can't. The earliest useful national census was taken in 1841 and they were thereafter taken every ten years and, since personal census data (as opposed to statistical results) is not released for a hundred years, the last useful census was taken in 1911. In five years' time we will be able to access the 1921 census; after that, nothing for 1931 and 1941.

So why no 1931 and 1941?

Well, in 1942 the returns for the entire 1931 census went up in flames - you can read more about it on the National Archives web site. Then, by 1941 there was a war on and a census was scarcely a priority. This meant that no census was taken between 1921 and 1951.

Luckily, all is not lost. On 29 September 1939, twenty-nine days after World War II was declared, a National Register was compiled. It listed personal details of every civilian in Great Britain and Northern Ireland in order to issue identity cards, organise rationing and so forth. It was later used by the National Health Service (NHS) when it started in 1948 and the records remained with the NHS until 1991 to maintain National Health numbers.

Although it didn't have quite as much information as a census, it did have names, date of birth and occupation of all civilians at each address in the country. You can now access it through the FindMyPast web site and when you do, the Hundred Year Rule only allows details of people born over 100 years ago to be shown; the others are redacted with the words 'This record is officially closed'.

So when we searched, what did we find in the 1939 National Register?

Our Piercy Family at Pentrobin Parsonage

First came the entry for my father, giving his date of birth as 5 February 1905 (over one hundred years ago now!) and described as 'Clerk in Holy Orders'. Then my mother with her date of birth as 20 January 1903 and described as 'Unpaid Domestic Duties'—the standard description in the 1939 Register for a housewife.



Then we have a couple of 'Officially Closed' entries. Almost certainly these were myself (I may feel and look over one hundred, but I'm not!) and my sister Averil.

Next comes my aunt on my father's side, Elsie M[uriel] Piercy and known to us as 'Auntie Muriel', born 23 March 1910, single and of 'Private Means'. So what was she doing here? I don't remember her staying with us for long, unlike my aunt Marjorie on my mother's side. Marjorie came and stayed with us when we children went down with a childhood malady—chickenpox, measles, whooping cough?—and went on to help my mother bring up the six children. She was almost a big sister to me. As for the 'Private Means', Muriel was a rather fragile character, unlike her twin brother Maurice. Maurice became very comfortable financially—he had trained as an accountant and went to the Far East after the war, becoming partner of Price Waterhouse (now PricewaterhouseCoopers). Muriel never did marry and for most of her life Maurice had supported her financially; maybe this was already the case but it seems more likely at the time that she was being supported by her father Frank Piercy who lived until 1952.

Then we have Iris Aubrey, with her later married surname Tew add to the record afterwards. Iris was born in 1922, on the 8th of December, so she would have been almost seventeen at the time, and was single. She was described as 'Domestic Servant'. Other records suggest that she was born in the Rhondda, married Thomas Tew in Hawarden in 1943 and died in Chester in 1985 aged 63. At the time of their marriage he was serving in the RAF and she was working on the land; in the Women's Land Army perhaps. Thomas died in 2006 age 85. They had one child, David Thomas Tew, who died in 2006, four months after his father.

Finally we have Dora Henderson and Anne L Mather, both described as 'Teacher (Senior School)'. Dora was 44 and Anne 33. Were they being lodged because they were teaching at the nearby Church of England school, or was it simply a commercial arrangement? As always, family history discoveries raise as many questions as they answer.

Cross Farm, Penymynydd

Traction Engine and Threshing Machine
Credit Liam Noonan, Creative Commons Licence
Just above the entry for Pentrobin Parsonage is one for Cross Farm, Penymynydd, home to the Jones family. I remember going round there to watch the travelling threshing machine and its steam traction engine (the pair later replaced by the modern combine harvester) when they came round to thresh the farmers' harvest. The sound of the belt driving the threshing machine from the steam engine - slop, slop, slop - remains very evocative and takes me back three-quarters of a century to that farmyard. You can still hear the sound at summer steam engine rallies.

The farm also had slightly less happy memories. I had just been given a very nice Yard-o-Led propelling pencil as a birthday present and wouldn't part with it so I took it with me over to Cross Farm when the threshing machine was at work. On my return home that pencil was no longer in my pocket! I went back and searched and searched but there was no sign of it among all the scattered straw. That was an expensive lesson!

Memories, Memories

Public Domain from Wikimedia Commons
More memories of this time and place:
  • My first memory of a Christmas tree - in the hall at Hawarden Castle nearby, the home of the Gladstone family.
  • Going through the newly-opened Liverpool Tunnel between Liverpool and Birkenhead in a car—I wonder whose? I don't remember us having one. I kept the ticket we were given when we paid our tunnel toll for years after - for the life of me I can't remember why it held such importance for me.
  • A more serious memory; the entire family going to the radio to listen to the Prime Minister announcing that war had been declared on Germany.
  • In contrast to that, the beauty of the celandine field in front of the Parsonage in full blossom announcing the arrival of spring and the excitement of my first school days at the local primary school next to the church.

When the bureaucrats filled in this single page of a supposedly dry old record they could hardly have anticipated the memories it would have brought flooding back!



We all belong to an ancient identity. Stories are the rivers that take us there.
Frank Delaney



Friday, June 17, 2016

My first DNA Match!

'I have received my results of my DNA and find that you are one of the people (the other is my nephew) who is a match with me.  I also have family named Eastland who lived in Kent.'

This is an extract from an email which arrived out of the blue from a lady, previously unknown to me, named Su. So who was Su and how did she connect with me?

A long time ago I posted that I had taken a genetic genealogy test with Family Tree DNA (FTDNA). Events intervened and I was not able to progress the results for some time, so you can imagine my delight when I received this email. A quick look at my database - it's such a long time since I progressed that particular branch - and I found my EASTLANDs of Kent right out at the end of my maternal grandmother's line. Terminal twigs on the family tree!

There are three main genetic genealogy tests:

  • Y-DNA, which traces back genetic changes passed down the male line and so goes back hundreds and thousands of years.
  • Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which traces back genetic changes passed down the female line and so also goes back hundreds and thousands of years.
  • Autosomal DNA (atDNA) which shows how my DNA has been made up of a mixture of the DNA from my parents, their parents, their parents, and so on.  As the DNA gets randomly diluted from generation to generation, atDNA is only useful to about 7 generations, say 200 years, back.

The test where Su and I matched was for autosomal DNA (FTDNA call it Family Finder) and my FTDNA results web page suggested that we were in the range 2nd - 4th Cousin. When it came to it they weren't far out!

No EASTLAND names matched initially but a day later and a few emails back and forth and we quickly established the connection. Su kindly sent a Family Group Sheet with both my ancestor Sarah EASTLAND and Sarah's brother Virgil EASTLAND and their parents. Another generation back - thanks, Su! - and the paper trail and the genetic genealogy results were both overlapping nicely showing that Su and I are fifth cousins.

Well, a lot more work would be needed on my part to bring the connection up to the full Genealogical Proof Standard - will I even manage it in my lifetime? The family history job list is quite long already and getting longer by the day. Every family historian will identify with that one and the need to prioritise! Never mind, the evidence looks pretty secure and, for the time being, I am content with that.

So, thanks to Su and my genetic genealogy DNA test I have found a new fifth cousin, extended a branch of my family tree by two generations, and proved to myself the effectiveness of this new tool in the family historian’s toolbox. Oh, and I've increased my score!

Thanks again, Su!



'The greatest history book ever written is the one hidden in our DNA.'
Dr. Spencer Wells


Tuesday, February 23, 2016

A Random Act of Kindness

It was old and battered and forlorn and its spine was falling apart. A bit like the writer, really. But there the resemblance ends, because this was—a Family Bible published in 1776.

None of us knew that we had a Family Bible, let alone one over two hundred years old that included some family names with their dates of birth written into the initial pages. When my eldest sister found it while rummaging through some old boxes she was as excited as I was. Her immediate kind reaction was to tell me, as the family historian, and to send me scans of the inscriptions inside the Bible, with the book itself following in the post.

The Inscriptions

So what was written on those fly pages?

Well, the most impressive inscription was a manuscript dedication in the most beautiful calligraphy. It immediately reminded me of another example of similarly beautiful hand-writing in the family, although that was of a rather later date and from another branch—the BISHOPPs.

The dedication reads:
Richard Osmond
The Gift of his Uncle
GEORGE GODDARD



And who was Richard OSMOND? Well, if his uncle was George GODDARD, then presumably his mother was also a GODDARD. As it happens I have a Richard OSMOND, 1804 - 1878, whose parents were John OSMOND and Mary (also referred to as Molly) GODDARD. Bingo! That makes him my great great grandfather and George is (to me) a new member of the family.




The next two pages have a list of the children of Richard OSMOND and Ann For some reason the left-hand page has a copy of the names on the right, with a couple of additions. No, I don't know why, either.


Left-hand page Right-hand page
Richard Osmond Born Decr 29th 1804
Ann Osmond Born July 3rd 1803
Richard Osmond born Decr 29th...
Ann Osmond Born July 3 18...
Children of the Above Children of the Above when Born
Edmund Osmond Born Novr 16th 1827
Alfred Osmond Do. Feby 26 1829
Do Do Died May 15 1831
Sarah Osmond Born Novr 26 1830
Mary Osmond Do Novr 2 1832
Do Do Died Novr 23 1837
Emma Osmond born March 7 1836
Elizabeth Osmond Born Novr 25 1837

Edmund Osmond Born Novr 16th 1827
Alfred Osmond Do. Feby 26 1829
Do Do Died May 15 1831
Sarah Osmond Born Novr 26th 1830
Mary Osmond Do Novr 2 - 1832
Do Died 
Novr 23 - 1837
Emma Osmond Do March 7 - 188...
Elizabeth Osmond Born Novr 25 - 18...
Maria Osmond Do Jan 7 - 18...
William Osmond Do Sept 2 - 18...
Do Do Died 
Novr 26 18...

Let's have a look at those two parents.

Richard OSMOND

Richard OSMOND's date of birth is given in the Family Bible as December 29th, 1804. This ties in nicely with the date I already have from the record in the Hurstbourne Tarrant parish registers (now kept at the Hampshire County Record Office) which records his baptism on 30 January 1805 and where he is described as 'Richard Osmond sn of John and Mary bn 29 Dec last'.

He was described as a butcher:
  • At the time of his sons Edmund and Alfred's baptisms in 1827 and 1829 respectively in the St Mary Reading parish records,
  • In the 1851 census when he was living at 58 Hurstbourne Street, Hurstbourne Tarrant along with Ann and his children Edmund, Ann and Maria,
  • At his son Edmund's wedding in 1854,
  • In the 1861 census also at Hurstbourne Street with Ann, his children Ann and Elizabeth, and his grandson John Hooper OSMOND, and
  • In the 1871 census, by now at Sheepward Street, Hurstbourne Tarrant.

Was this his marriage?

So when did he marry, and what was Ann's maiden name? The only record I could find of a Richard OSMOND marrying an Ann in the period 1822 - 1832 was on 21 August 1827 at St George's, Hanover Square where he was named as 'Richard Osmond, a bachelor of this parish' and she was named as 'Ann Pullin, a spinster of the parish of Caversham in the County of Oxford'. Could this be the right couple? If so, then they were a long way from home, though that might have been explained by the four months between their marriage and the birth of their first child.

Bishop's Transcript of Marriage of Richard Osmond and Ann Pullin,
21 Aug 1827, St George Hanover Square, Westminster

Then I found a record on the FamilySearch web site of the death their daughter Sarah [Osmond] ROMBALD [sic] on 22 March 1932 in Chatsworth, Livingston, Illinois, USA. Bingo! again. Imagine my surprise and delight when I saw that her parents were named there as 'Richard Osmond' and 'Ann Pullen' [sic]. So the St George's, Hanover Square marriage indeed appears to be the likely one. This just goes to show the importance of researching collateral lines as well as the main line.

I will be posting more details of Sarah and her marriage and emigration to the United States here soon.

In Remembrance

He and Ann, as well as three of their children, are remembered on a headstone in Hurstbourne Tarrant which reads:
In Loving Memory of
Ann Osmond wife of Richard
born 1806 died 1869
and Alfred died 1831 aged 2 years and 3 months May 20th 1831
Mary died 1837 aged 3 years Nov 28th 1837
and William died 1841
On the kerbing at the bottom:
Richard Osmond died March 22nd 1878 aged 73 yrs
The dates of death for Alfred and Mary differ slightly from those in the Bible; perhaps those on the grave refer to their burials.

Reading Mercury - Saturday 30 March 1878

Ann

As for Ann, her date of birth is given as July 3, 1805. Again, this ties in nicely with the approximate date that I already had from the 1851 census of about 1804 at Kintbury in Berkshire.  The Family Bible now gives us an exact date.

Reading Mercury - Saturday 23 January 1869

The Children

They all have their own stories; I will tell what I know of their stories in a later post here.


So thank you, sister, for this contribution of yours to the family records!


No act of kindness, no matter how small, is ever wasted.
AESOP, The Lion and the Mouse


Monday, January 18, 2016

An OSMOND Loses Out...

...but was he one of ours?


From the Police Gazette for Monday 6 July 1863



The furthest we have traced our OSMOND line back is to Stephen OSMOND, 1657 - 1713, of Ogbourne St George in Wiltshire. From the beginning to the middle of the nineteenth century the family were in the area of Hurstbourne Tarrant in Hampshire, some fifty miles or so north east of Okeford Fitzpaine, so no close geographical connection to William OSMOND. I have six William OSMONDs in my records but none looks a likely match to this William OSMOND.

A project based at University College London (UCL) that is investigating the distribution of surnames in Great Britain, both current and historic and displays its results at the publicprofiler web site. The Distribution of OSMOND surname in 1881 page shows the OSMOND name appearing in 1881 across the south western counties of England, as well as some in South Wales and, of course, London. The South Wales connection is probably through coal mining - there were coal mines in northern Somerset until recent times and mining families from there would move to the more prosperous South Wales coal field in search of better wages.

By Keith Pickering (Own work)
[CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0)], via Wikimedia Commons

As you might expect, the OSMONDs had spread out across the country in the more than one hundred years between 1881 and 1998. However, the Distribution of OSMOND surname in 1998 page shows that they are still mainly in the South of England although there is an isolated bunch in the Galashiels area, just north of the border between England and Scotland. What was that all about? There must be an interesting story behind their appearance as a little island so far from the south of England.

And, of course, there is said to be a family of rather well-known singers in the United States with the surname OSMOND, though I understand that their roots are in Oxfordshire...

So I have found no direct connection between our family and William OSMOND - a pity, as that watch, if it had ever been found, would have made an heirloom with an interesting story behind it.